Add targets to a conservation planning problem() by log-linearly interpolating the targets between thresholds based on the total amount of each feature in the study area (Rodrigues et al. 2004). Additionally, caps can be applied to targets to prevent features with massive distributions from being over-represented in solutions (Butchart et al. 2015).

  cap_amount = NULL,
  cap_target = NULL,
  abundances = feature_abundances(x, na.rm = FALSE)$absolute_abundance



problem() (i.e. ConservationProblem) object.


numeric threshold.


numeric relative target that should be applied to features with a total amount that is less than or equal to lower_bound_amount.


numeric threshold.


numeric relative target that should be applied to features with a total amount that is greater than or equal to upper_bound_amount.


numeric total amount at which targets should be capped. Defaults to NULL so that targets are not capped.


numeric amount-based target to apply to features which have a total amount greater than argument to cap_amount. Defaults to NULL so that targets are not capped.


numeric total amount of each feature to use when calculating the targets. Defaults to the feature abundances in the study area (calculated using the feature_abundances() function.


Object (i.e. ConservationProblem) with the targets added to it.


Targets are used to specify the minimum amount or proportion of a feature's distribution that needs to be protected. All conservation planning problems require adding targets with the exception of the maximum cover problem (see add_max_cover_objective()), which maximizes all features in the solution and therefore does not require targets.

Seven parameters are used to calculate the targets: lower_bound_amount specifies the first range size threshold, lower_bound_target specifies the relative target required for species with a range size equal to or less than the first threshold, upper_bound_amount specifies the second range size threshold, upper_bound_target specifies the relative target required for species with a range size equal to or greater than the second threshold, cap_amount specifies the third range size threshold, cap_target specifies the absolute target that is uniformly applied to species with a range size larger than that third threshold, and finally abundances specifies the range size for each feature that should be used when calculating the targets.

The target calculations do not account for the size of each planning unit. Therefore, the feature data should account for the size of each planning unit if this is important (e.g. pixel values in the argument to features in the function problem() could correspond to amount of land occupied by the feature in \(km^2\) units). Additionally, the function can only be applied to ConservationProblem objects that are associated with a single zone.


Early versions (< used different equations for calculating targets.


Rodrigues ASL, Akcakaya HR, Andelman SJ, Bakarr MI, Boitani L, Brooks TM, Chanson JS, Fishpool LDC, da Fonseca GAB, Gaston KJ, and others (2004) Global gap analysis: priority regions for expanding the global protected-area network. BioScience, 54: 1092--1100.

Butchart SHM, Clarke M, Smith RJ, Sykes RE, Scharlemann JPW, Harfoot M, Buchanan, GM, Angulo A, Balmford A, Bertzky B, and others (2015) Shortfalls and solutions for meeting national and global conservation area targets. Conservation Letters, 8: 329--337.

See also


# load data data(sim_pu_raster, sim_features) # create problem using loglinear targets p <- problem(sim_pu_raster, sim_features) %>% add_min_set_objective() %>% add_loglinear_targets(10, 0.9, 100, 0.2) %>% add_binary_decisions() %>% add_default_solver(verbose = FALSE) # \dontrun{ # solve problem s <- solve(p) # plot solution plot(s, main = "solution", axes = FALSE, box = FALSE)
# }